Which giant pictures are real and which are fake?
In this article, you will learn the facts about the people of Ad (Akkadian Empire) mentioned in the holy Quran book.
The pictures left from a photoshop contest were thought to be real and spread around, even reflected in magazines and newspapers. People who do not understand image programming may think these pictures, which are made by enlarging and pasting a real human skeleton on another picture, are real, while people with image programming knowledge can understand that they are fake even when they look a little carefully. On the website below you can also see the giant pictures, which at first glance appear to be fake. The site is already a photoshop contest site.
http://blog.designcrowd.com/article/880/giant-skeletons-seem-too-real-to-be-a-hoax
Although these fake giant pictures have caused confusion, there are certainly real pictures and evidences about giants. You can find real pictures of giants in the link below.
First of all, all the sites describing the giants you will see on the internet mixed fake and real pictures together and either accepted all of them as real or considered them all fake. whereas the fake pictures were published on the designcrowd site, which organizes a worldwide photoshop contest.
Below we will analyze the most realistic giant images, some of which are not found on the photoshop site.
In order to check the authenticity of the pictures on the internet, we used the ELA (Error Level Analysis) analysis program, which is also used by forensic institutions around the world and has a very high reliability level. If you want to research and learn whether the digital pictures are real or fake, you can get free “ELA” analysis training from our site. (Click for free ELA analysis tutorial)
In summary, in this ELA program, if there is concentrated white or blackness on a high resolution picture, we understand that the picture is manipulated and that part is added. In other words, if there is a concentrated dark black or dark white color in one area, those areas of the picture have been tampered with. So these pictures are fake. If this is not the case and the colors in the picture appear to be spread close to each other and homogeneously, we understand that it has not been altered, that is, it is most likely real.
This is the most realistic picture on the site (the giant skull coming out of the water) on the site, it’s obvious from the other pictures at first glance, but this one seems pretty real. When I researched where the picture was first shared, it was first shared on the photosop contest site (Designcrowd). and in order to analyze the picture I need to find the highest resolution one. but this is the first version of the picture and it is in very low resolution. but when we analyze it, although it is in low resolution, we see both adobe writing and obviously this giant skull is bright white, so it was added here later. So fake.
One of the things that confused me the most was this (above) picture of a giant giant with blue plastic on it. The image was posted on designcrowd and it’s fake.
*analysis of this giant picture above (red brush – 3 workers) shows that it is fake. The picture has already been posted on the photoshop site and made for the contest. Here is the link https://www.designcrowd.com/design/8854061
*I couldn’t find the real source of this giant picture (in water) that looks very realistic above. But the picture is most likely fake. Because you see the color difference in the region where the giant is and in other regions. Colors are not homogeneous.
*This picture of a giant (with two men with their backs turned) on the top, which is so perfectly prepared, that bothered me a lot, is also fake. The original version of the picture is on this site. site of a team of archaeologists. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna11594274
*This giant painting, which is claimed to be found on the island of Pitcairn, is really perfectly crafted, it deserves to fool people. This picture, which is very difficult to understand from the image analysis, is fake. but when I found the original version of the picture on this site, I was completely sure that it was fake. this is the site of a travel team. https://www.picton-castle.com/archive/captains_logs/2005_3.html
*this giant picture on the top (digging with arabic hand) is also fake and really well done. here is the original of this picture is on this site and here is the site of an archaeologist team. http://www.adias-uae.com/press2002.html
* No matter how much I researched about this giant picture at the top (the man with the white hat in the tunnel), I could not find any evidence that it was fake. From the “ELA” analysis of the picture, it seems that there is no problem. Ela analysis is very difficult to fool, but not impossible. Again, the skull in the fake picture we just saw is taken from this picture. so this skull is suspect. That’s why it looks suspicious in the picture.
Again, I couldn’t find the source of the picture above (in Greece, where the man took notes). And no matter how I look at the Ela analysis of the painting, it seems like there is a problem and there isn’t. The colors seem to be very compatible with each other, but at the same time, there seems to be a difference in the region where the giant is. Finally, if this picture is photoshoped, it is very perfectly prepared. And the fact that no information has been found about such a painting is suspicious.
*The original version of the giant pictures above (which seems to be in Egypt) has been published on this site. https://web.archive.org/web/20010415160535/http://www.egiptologia.pl/galeria3.html
Pictures were deleted due to an error on the site in 2010. But the pictures are real. some claim that these pictures look like they are big because of the camera’s lens feature. but this bucket right next to the skull has another view from the same excavation site. When you compare the buckets, you realize how big the giant’s skull really is. so the skull is really big. So these giants could be real.
-The analysis of the picture (below) found in Edinburgh, Scotland, which is said to be the knight, says that there is no problem, but we cannot be sure about the “ELA” analysis because the picture is low resolution. but when we look at the other pictures taken in the same region, especially in these pictures that were reflected in the media, the bones of the giants were removed. Besides, when you compare the size of the empty tomb of the giants with the size of the people there, this giant picture looks realistic. so most likely these giant pictures are also real.
The pictures in the examples (below) that you will see are enlarged. When we do a general search on the internet with google lens, if both large and small versions of the same picture appear, it is already fake. The other picture was enlarged in the same way and even deleted some of the garbage in the original picture.
As you can see, the giant pictures that look like they were taken in an unrealistic way are not real. But there is of course real evidence of giants. To see them, wait for the 8th Ancient Gods Giants episode of the Earth’s Black Box documentary. It will be published soon on our youtube channel.
Sancaktar Tekkilic
FHÖ Production